Monday, February 20, 2017

What Do We Know About Geology To Help Explain Barbosa and Leal's Use of Ground Rods?

Resistivity

Since Resistivity can be around 10 ohms – and upwards to nearly 100 ohms – per cubic meter near the surface of the Earth, it can be inferred from this that Barbosa and Leal does not seek to magnify capacitance in their circuit as a singular factor. In other words, the Earth doesn't represent a huge capacitor to the energy traveling around inside of B&L's circuit. The Earth is more likely a weak resistor. But this allows for this circuit's characteristic emphasis to lie elsewhere among some other factor of electrodynamics. This terrestrial resistance acts as a weak load which is ever present. Such mild loads are usually held as safety checks to disallow the circuit from frying itself should no load be engaged when the circuit is first turned ON.

Electrostatic Depth

The ground rods are kept closely spaced. One meter separates their radius. This implies that only the length of each ground rod is the depth of DC Electrostatic Resistivity to which B&L's circuit will encounter – no more than this (as further noted, below). So, a volume of soil bounded by a depth of eight feet – and whose width and length is no more width and length than the same as is covered by the orderly arrangement of all of the ground rods spaced next to one another – is the volume of Resistivity to which B&L's circuit encounters.

Electromagnetic Depth

On the other hand, the depth to which any electromagnetic wave (emanating from out of B&L's ground rods) can penetrate the Earth is determined by a lack of Resistivity within the soil surrounding the ground rods. Since this circuit depends upon geoelectromagnetics to magnify its output beyond that of its input, soil conductivity is to be avoided – as Clarence has already discovered during rains.
Depth of Electromagnetic penetration is also enhanced by the low frequency of consumers' use of municipal power (ranging from 50 to 60 cycles per second as indicated by Clarence's replication of Barbosa and Leal's AC version of their circuit). This conclusion is derived from the Magnetotelluric Field Method of geologic surveying...

... depth penetration increases with a decrease in frequency ...” Section 2.1.3 of My AIMS Essay.

Induced Polarization

The operational procedure of the Induced Polarization (IP) method is similar to the resistivity method, as it also employs the same electrode configurations. However, the most effective ones are the double dipole and Schlumberger electrode configurations. The measurements are fraught with certain errors or anomalies (noise) which may be due to telluric currents, and electromagnetic coupling between measuring equipments like the wires, where current can be induced on another wire as a result of the shorter distance of separation between the two wires (Ampere’s law). [proximity of grounding rods]

Induced polarization may be time-domain, where controlled current signals are introduced into the ground through the two current electrodes, and the overvoltage between the signals is measured across the two potential electrodes. It could also be frequency domain, where the alternating current fed into the ground depends on frequency. It makes use of the principle that, when an alternating current is passed into the ground, the apparent resistivity of rocks in which polarisation can be induced is higher with low-frequency current than with higher-frequency current. This is because the capacitance of the ground inhibits the passage of direct currents but transmits alternating currents with increasing efficiency as the frequency rises [KB84].” Section 2.2.3 of My AIMS Essay.

3.8 Pulse-transient electromagnetic systems

These may also be referred to as the time-domain EM systems. The systems work by generating an electromagnetic field which induces a series of currents in the Earth at increasing depths over time. These currents create a magnetic field which is measured by the receiver in order to deduce subsurface properties and features at great depth. In other cases, it is the decaying voltage observed while the current is turned off, that is measured and recorded as a function of time. The magnitude and rate of decay of the eddy currents depend on the conductivity of the medium and on the geometry of the conductive layers. Currents will decay very rapidly in media with high resistivity. A conductive layer at a depth may “trap” currents in that layer, while currents elsewhere decay more rapidly. Section 3.8 of My AIMS Essay.

Field Antenna

I propose that B&L casts a net to “catch” the same fish as its net is composed of, namely that of: electromagnetics. And whatever it manages to collect is from no greater a depth than the length of each ground rod.

Orientation of Ground Rods

And the electromagnetism which these ground rods collect travels horizontally along the underside of the surface of the Earth tangential to the Earth's center of mass. This would evoke hints that this energy's origin is both manmade and put there by lightning strikes – not emanating outwardly towards the sky from the Earth's center. That would be a different energy source from the Earth's mass, itself.

Galvanic Response

It can't be ignored that the copper plating on each ground rod, overlaying its inner steel, creates a mild battery of electric charge despite the seeming mildness of this contribution towards the overall charge imparted to the soil by B&L's circuit.

Terrestrial Response

Nor can it be ignored that the Earth responds like a living breathing organism toward any electromagnetic influence – imparted to it from above – by its inhabitants.

No comments:

Post a Comment