Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Why did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002, second hand, but in otherwise mint condition?

I bought my classic for two reasons: I wanted to contribute to what has proven itself to be the best solution for going green despite the inconvenience of driving an electric car in today's world of politically correct bondage to the gas pump. {For my part, I administered a protest-oriented bike ride over a decade ago protesting our dependency on foreign oil.} But I also wanted the personal inconvenience to serve as motivation (as a diehard activist) to see if I could do something (no matter how small or insignificant) to resolve and promote a better way to integrate electric cars into our society.

I bought my car three years ago to motivate myself to learn some electrical theory – something I had fastidiously avoided in college for my disgust of equations and the apparent lack of teaching mere basic theory (an overview of sorts – kind of like the equivalent to music appreciation but in the realm of electrical engineering). That would have been nice to take as a college course if it ever existed. But I settled on teaching myself by – of course – lots of reading, going to conferences, making contact with a couple of savvy engineers, and perform a few experiments of my own.

One mythological story of Nikola Tesla intrigued me to resolve the missing pieces which has left most people wondering if the story is nothing more than a work of fiction. But something convinced me otherwise once I dug into the history of this particular premise.

A long time ago in a land not so far away – here, in this country, the United States, in fact – telegraph operators were having problems manning their stations on days in which an anomaly repeatedly occurred: they couldn't go near their telegraph terminal – much less touch the telegraph key – on certain days in which the whole system was surcharged with an enormous excess of energy or else risk a very strong shock to their body while the surge sought to ground itself through the telegraph operator's body to Earth ground.

Fast forward a few decades to the turn of the last century when the two giants of promoting electricity, Edison and Tesla, were competing in New York city for customers. Tesla had his transmission system based on AC, while Edison was busy with DC.

But Edison was losing ground. AC travels long distances without dissipation better than DC. But there's a worse nightmare saddling DC, both its transmission for delivering power as well as for delivering messages: the risk of parasitic transients building up somewhere within the transmission line. They suck up energy from the system and then blow up transformers and initiate blackouts.

Well....
Along comes a few people who have made a diligent task of studying the problem of oscillating transients for the intention to do more than merely prevent them, but actually go further and harness them as a source of so-called free energy, so-called – at least in this case – because the energy is not free – it's paid for – but paid for on the expectation (and pricing structure) that it will be used merely once with the expectation that more energy will be demanded by us immediately afterwards and priced accordingly.

Well, what if a circuit could be designed that captured energy for the purpose of its reuse? Thus, the true cost would merely be for losses due to friction, etc.

Such appears to be the case with a number of inventions spanning nearly a century...

Nikola Tesla's Special Generator, as reported to us by William Lyne in his book, entitled: “Pentagon Aliens” and also demonstrated by a coworker of a friend of mine over ten years ago without any explanation to speak of other than it worked with aluminum, copper and iron – just like Tesla's – and thus has been renamed by us as: Tesla's Tri-Metal Generator.

Tesla demonstrated a 1913 Pierce-Arrow luxury car (weighing over 4,000 pounds!) driven by an AC motor plus Tesla's mysterious circuitry achieving normal highway speeds.

The Nazi's used Tesla's invention in some of their U-boats giving them a range of 30,000 miles. This is where it gets interesting since the one solid clue we have of this technology is William Lyne's quotation of a Mr. Dort, Sr., who worked with Tesla in developing this system for the Nazis. {Tesla was short of funds at this stage in his life and didn't mind, too much, working for the Germans since they had already stole some of his patents, outright, anyway, by that time.} To wit...
“For every 200 pounds of iron added to this device, one horsepower output is increased.”

My friend's coworker ran a medium sized motor from a project box the size and shape of a notebook. The only indulgence this coworker made to my friend over a decade ago for sharing some insight into its construction was the cryptic answer that it incorporated the use of copper, iron and aluminum in its construction. My friend never saw this coworker again.

Jim Murray used synchronous generators to save Bethlehem Steel (of Michigan) thousands of dollars a month for saving them from the price gouging which the local power company had been performing on billing the company for the use of power to merely warm up the magnetic field coils on their rock moving equipment's motors. This power is eventually returned back into the grid (minus any losses) when the motors shut down. But that didn't stop the power company from forcing Bethlehem Steel to shut down their synchronous generator when Jim Murray left them to pursue other work.

Jim went on to develop his Dynaflux Alternator, his SERPS switching technology, and his transforming generator to continue to develop this concept of recycling our use of electrical energy.

Well...
Along comes two young inventors from the Portuguese district of Brazil who have managed to design a circuit suitable for either AC or DC output which uses the magnetic, or electric, potential difference between two sets of grounding rods to drive the amperage within a simple continuous loop of wire in the heart of their circuit to supply the circuit's load with whatever amount of energy is required – the caveat being that the wire gauges have to be thick enough to not overheat! The fact that weak geomagnetic locations require the user to compensate by enlarging the mass of one of the two sets of grounding rods (each set is connected in series to all other rods within its own set), plus the fact that the only English speaking person (who is located here in the US) who has been the first to successfully replicate this device insists that all of these rods must be copper clad steel. In other words, Tesla's quote of increasing his Special Generator's output by increasing the mass of its use of iron is reflected here. This is the best I can do to hint at a possible reincarnation of Tesla's Special Generator in the guise of the Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal, but close enough to have me all enthused!

To more fully explain this principle of operating an overunity electrical device on oscillating amperage, we must bring in a mechanical example resulting from the work of Veljko Milković.


The oscillating pendulum is using gravity to perform most of the work. All that is additionally needed is to push the weighted pendulum with a pinkie finger to gradually build up momentum until there is sufficient energy in each swing of the pendulum to rock the arm of the heavily weighted hammer. The swinging pendulum represents oscillations which tie up the energy contributed by one's pinkie, but also reduces the amount of energy needed to rock the hammer's arm. The swinging pendulum represents what would have been a problem had it been a parasitic transient in the midst of an electrical transmission line. But instead, here it is being used to reduce work that we have to do to make the intended outcome happen. The work of one's little pinkie finger represents the offset we have to make up for the frictional losses of the bearings and air drag imposed upon all of the moving parts of this system. But the energy required to rock the hammer's heavy arm is all done by gravity acting upon the pendulum. We need not impose any other input of power to make the hammer rock. Bravo!

This is a mechanical equivalent of an oscillating circuit. This is free energy and overunity, also known as: energy entering into the system does not equal energy coming out. The Conservation Law of Physics has not been violated since no one is going to bill Mother Nature for Her gravity contributing to making this into a very profitable enterprise. Yet, we can pray that She keeps it up!



There are five different forces at work here and they're not all equal...
  1. The force of one's little finger periodically applied at the right moment of the pendulum's upswing and in the right direction to enhance its upward motion.
  2. The accumulating force of the ever increasing arc of the swinging pendulum.
  3. Acceleration, due to gravity, of the pendulum reaching maximum thrust at the bottom of its swing. This momentary acceleration of the pendulum eventually becomes large enough to lower the tail end of the hammer and raise its head. Upon the pendulum's deceleration as it rises upwards, the tail end of the hammer rises thus ...
  4. Allowing the hammer's head to fall and strike the anvil beneath it using the accelerative force of gravity ...
  5. After the hammer's head had accelerated during its rise induced by leverage of its falling tail.

No comments:

Post a Comment