Gmail - [OT] Why did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand but in otherwise mint condition?
|
Vinyasi .
<SNIP>
|
[OT] Why did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand
but in otherwise mint condition?
|
Vinyasi
|
Fri,
Jan 20, 2017 at 1:36 AM
|
|
To:
Earl C
Cc: RAV4 EV Mailing
List
|
“This
is a perpetual motion machine” and thus we should ignore this
idea and the person promoting it since it can't possibly operate as
he/she predicts and he/she is not reputable since no professional
would make such a claim had he/she bothered to take college level
courses and passed their elementary exams.
Good
point. Which machine are you referring to?
The
Two-Stage Oscillator of Veljko Milković is not a
mechanical self-runner in that it still requires the input of a
well-timed push upon its weighted pendulum, or else the assistance of
electromechanical devices (generators, motors, etc) placed as
intermediate steps within the context of its purely mechanical two
stages of oscillation in order to continue to oscillate. Thus,
perpetuity is not possible with this mechanical example. And if the
device is not properly tuned, parasitic beat frequencies arise
canceling its magnified output and thus killing its overunity
coefficient of performance.
When tuned properly,
the oscillations of both systems act together to produce “harmonic
reenforcement” of the energy stored in the combined oscillatory
system, and very large force amplifications are possible. When left
untuned, or improperly tuned, the oscillations of the two systems
cause “beat frequencies” against one another, and the
force amplification is dissipated in “parasitic oscillations.”
Therefore, the machine can only function as a Mechanical Amplifier
when it is built well AND tuned properly.
The
Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal is
also not a perpetual motion machine in that it is dependent on an
Earth-based series of grounding rods. And like most machines of this
type: it is not a self-starter nor is it auto-adaptive – if the
Earth between the two sets of grounding rods should lack a strong
geomagnetism, or become sogged with water from a rainstorm, then the
electrical output of this device drops dramatically requiring more
grounding rods among the larger of the two sets leading directly to
the Electric Keeper...
In
this electrical example,
some of the output is fed back to a battery charger to recharge the
battery that runs the circuit which drives the Electric Keeper which
collects additional input from the Earth network of grounding rods
whose contribution is of an indeterminate limit (no one knows,
precisely, how much contribution from the Earth is possible). But if
Clarence's undisclosed photovoltaic alternative to this Earth-based
electrical system is substituted in place of the grounding rods, then
geomagnetism and remaining in a fixed location no longer apply.
Hence, adaption to an EV is possible, although not practical –
yet. This PV alternative is fed by a single light bulb; not by
external light.
Now,
after looking at the situation, I can see your point of view becoming
more self-evident: the mechanical two-stage oscillator of Veljko
Milković is self-contained and not surprisingly is not a
self-runner (not a perpetual motion machine). And the Earth Captor of
Barbosa and Leal is not self-contained, but must be tied to a system
of two sets of grounding rods making this not a perpetual motion
machine since the Earth is contributing a potential difference
between the two sets of grounding rods. Only time will tell how
Clarence's photovoltaic alternative to Barbosa and Leal manages to be
a self-runner since he's not publicizing his schematic; he's only
publicizing his initial
test results.
So,
the important question to ask is: is any device an energy amplifying
system? And, where does it get its amplification from? Hence,
perpetual motion – as a concept – is an impediment to
understanding since perpetuity ignores exterior contributions of
energy.
The
only important questions for us to consider is: does it work? And, is
it practical? And, will somebody else please build it for me? This
latter is a contradiction to prevailing social standards of the
economic model of corporate behavior. Anything not requiring too much
regular maintenance checks from authorized dealers under warranty,
nor replacement due to quick wear-out or boredom from jaded consumers
requiring a new model every year to replace the last one which still
runs perfectly well, does not fit the economic model of today's
society. But you already know this.
On
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Earl C wrote:
Vinyasi,
Cool animation, however, its a perpetual motion
machine.
All the energy imparted to the hammer
must first be imparted to the pendulum. The pendulum will lose
speed (energy) when the arm it hangs from comes down as it passes
bottom dead center. That energy will have to be replace by
pushing on the pendulum again.
The only thing this might
enable would be you could get a lot of energy out of the hammer if
you locked it in the down position, then added a little energy to the
pendulum on each swing to get it swinging very high. You could
then release the lock on the hammer, the pendulum would pick the
hammer up the next time it swung down and the hammer would strike as
the pendulum reached the top of its swing. There may be a few
progressively lighter taps of the hammer as the pendulum slows down
gradually.
The total energy of the hammer would still be no
more than the little pushes to the pendulum added up.
TANSTAAFL
(There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch)
-----------------------------------------
From: "Vinyasi ."
To: "RAV4 EV Mailing
List"
Cc:
Sent: 18-Jan-2017 22:26:30 +0000
Subject:
Re: [RAV4-EV] [OT] Why did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand but in
otherwise mint condition?
I knew it was incomplete when I wrote it yesterday, but I was too
tired to finish. So, this morning I added this to try and make the
basic idea a little more accessible to the majority point of view.
------------------------
To
more fully explain this principle of operating an overunity
electrical device on oscillating amperage, we must bring in a
mechanical example resulting from the work of Veljko Milković.
Vinyasi
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 3:13 PM
|
|
To:
David Miller
Cc:
RAV4 EV Mailing List <...@evchargernews.com>
|
|
Vinyasi
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 2:03 PM
|
|
To:
David Miller
Cc: RAV4 EV Mailing
List
|
--------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================
---------------------------------------------------------
On
Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
Autodidacts
have difficulty ascertaining when they are wrong.
Every
patent of this sort is rejected without scrutiny because they are
absurd.
Over
the last 100 years, thousands of attempts of this sort have served
only
to
identify people working beyond their limits.
Try
to understand a simple spring first. Enroll in a 1st semester
college physics class and
you
will, at least I hope, begin to use words like "free energy"
without confusing it with
force,
momentum or impulse.
I
can't be nice about this because you haven't done your homework.
-David
Miller
--------
Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: [OT] Why did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand but in otherwise
mint condition?
Local
Time: January 19, 2017 12:46 PM
UTC
Time: January 19, 2017 8:46 PM
Vinyasi
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 12:46 PM
|
|
To:
David
Miller
Cc: RAV4 EV Mailing
List
|
Einstein
is no Steinmetz. The former never had to deal with what the latter
could readily tackle: troubleshooting Edison's parasitic
transients affecting his ability to deliver DC power to his
customers.
A
more germane question is: can Einstein handle parasitic
transients: explain them, and put them to good use?
Perpetual
motion machines is definitely off topic since it has no relevance to
parasitic transients oscillating within a transmission line, nor
within the Electric Keeper of Barbosa and Leal's Earth Captor.
Throwing
something out does not validate the same degree of intelligence as
does integration. It's easy to reject dumb inventions. But how
difficult is it to profit from challenges? An oscillating current is
definitely a challenge, but not unworthy of investigation.
Of
course, oscillating currents are not equivalent to either AC or DC
despite their being born of either one.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:35:57 -0500
From: David Miller
To:
...@evchargernews.com
Subject:
Re: [RAV4-EV] RAV4-EV Digest, Vol 172, Issue 7
Albert
Einstein spent all his patent office time rejecting
perpetual
motion machines just like this.
Vinyasi
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 12:33 PM
|
To: Arthur Keller
|
I
disagree. The content is not Off Topic since it's very difficult for
people to understand parasitic transients without recourse to simple
analogies from mechanical dynamics.
What
is a parasitic transient oscillating within a transmission line and
why should it not always be discarded as either a nuisance or as a
"speculative energy sources" presumed to be not
relevant to EVs? It is just such a misunderstanding and
under-appreciation of this topic that I feel preserves our doubt that
having a self-charging EV is not a possibility worthy of my two-cents
worth to state the facts to the contrary. This is not idle
speculation. This is taking responsibility for the short-comings of
pursuing a non-populist opinion by taking charge of its
misunderstanding.
I
apologize if I tax your patience with my thoroughness.
But
if you don't want me to contribute, then so be it. I won't.
This
is too relevant to keep private.
On
Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Arthur Keller wrote:
Arthur
Keller <arthur@kellers.org>
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 12:21 PM
|
|
To:
"Vinyasi”
Cc: Earl C,
"rav4-ev@evchargernews.com"
|
The
subject of this string of messages was labelled “[OT] Why did I
buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand but in otherwise mint condition?”
That topic in not OT. But the content of the message *is*
OT, about speculative energy sources.
It
is clear that this string of messages has veered off into a topic not
even tangentially related to EVs. So please take this
discussion off this list.
Best
regards,
Arthur
On
Jan 19, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Vinyasi . <vinyaasi@gmail.com>
wrote:
Vinyasi
|
Thu,
Jan 19, 2017 at 12:12 PM
|
|
To:
Earl C
Cc: RAV4 EV Mailing
List <...@evchargernews.com>
|
I'll
agree with you since it's irrelevant to daisy-chained multiplicity of
oscillations.
The
tell tale sign is that the hammer won't lift right away. It has to
wait until the oscillations build up to an amplitude large enough to
move the hammer. From that point forward, the hammer will move up and
down with a force not equal to the force applied to the pendulum.
The
hammer is doing all the work and suffering all of the losses. Not so
with the pendulum. It's only losses are from air drag and the
minimalist friction at its hanging point. In fact, we can bolt the
hammer to a fixed condition without any impact upon the ability of
the pendulum to swing with each well timed push in the right
direction.
Despite
any error on my part to think that acceleration of gravity has any
relevance to this discussion, the important fact is that reaction
against the hammer is not allowed to affect the pendulum. Thus, in
this simple two stage oscillator, reaction does not fully equate to
action within the context of the entire throughput. The pendulum's
reactions to every push applied to it certainly affects the hammer at
some point (but not right away), but the same cannot be said of the
hammer: the hammer's reactions to gravity do not affect the
pendulum's swings at all. This break in the continuity between
reaction and action - from which the Law of Conservation of Motion is
intimately connected - violates our obsession with applying this law
to every circumstance regardless of relevance. This law always
applies to singular closed systems; not to multiple open systems
transferring energy to each other in a non-bidirectional fashion.
Within the limited domain of each oscillator, reaction has to equal
action. But outside of each and between them both, their
interrelationship is not unlike that of an irreversible chemical
reaction. This is where reaction is not allowed to affect action and
conservation does not apply.
I
believe we risk discarding something which our imperialistic
consciousness highly values: control, if we should accept the
inherent limitation of applying this law to each circumstance.
Parasitic transients in electrical transmission lines are a fact of
life: their lack of response to our control violates our sense of
rigor. Only by their suppression do we achieve control over them,
because they refuse to acknowledge our cherished Law of Conservation.
They are a law unto themselves. We can either reject their
coexistence with us, or else learn to live with them in a manner that
won't entirely defeat us so that we may benefit from the
relationship.
On
Jan 19, 2017 8:12 AM, Earl C wrote:
Vinyasi,
I
only take the time to try to help one proponent of a perpetual motion
scheme each year. Its now 2017 so you're it for this year.
I've made a careful attempt to point out the problem with your
scheme. I'll make one more comment.
You're
confusing force and acceleration with energy. It's a common
point people miss.
Energy
is force applied over a distance (E = F X D). The energy you'll
apply to lift the hammer's head will be the same whether it comes
from force applied to pushing the pendulum through part of it's arc
several times or whether it comes from just pushing down on the
hammer's tail or pushing up on the hammer's head. The only
thing that may be different from these 3 approaches is that some may
require less force but over longer distance applied.
I
recommend you make a real version of this and try it instead of just
an animation.
Best
Regards,
Earl
-----------------------------------------
From:
"Vinyasi ."
To:
"Earl C"
Cc:
"RAV4 EV Mailing List"
Sent:
19-Jan-2017 05:43:52 +0000
We
have four different forces at work here and they're not all equal...
The
force of one's little finger periodically applied at the right
moment of the pendulum's upswing and in the right direction to
enhance its upward motion.
The
accumulating force of the ever increasing arc of the swinging
pendulum.
Acceleration,
due to gravity, of the pendulum reaching maximum thrust at the
bottom of its swing. This momentary acceleration of the pendulum
eventually becomes large enough to lower the tail end of the hammer
and raise its head. Upon the pendulum's deceleration as it rises
upwards, the tail end of the hammer rises thus ...
Allowing
the hammer's head to fall and strike the anvil beneath it using the
accelerative force of gravity.
Vinyasi . <SNIP>
|
Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:39 PM
|
|
To: Earl C <SNIP>
|
It's not a cool
animation, because my text did not make clear that this is not
a perpetual motion machine along with the significance of the
missing element in the animation: that of a person's little
finger periodically pushing the weighted pendulum to gradually
arrive at its full breadth of arc and maintain it there (should
that person fall asleep, OOPS, there goes perpetual motion out
the window). Only when sufficient arc breadth is reached
(very quickly in an oscillating electrical circuit by
comparison to this mechanical analogy) will the momentum of
the swinging pendulum be sufficient to move the hammer up and
down with a force equivalent to that of an equivalent hammer
without a person gently pushing a non-existent weighted
pendulum. The loss of a human 'helper' would avoid the
use of a weighted pendulum responding to gravity.
It doesn't sound
like you've ever pushed a child in a swing, or else have
forgotten what it's like to get yourself up to a full swing on
the same amount of force imparted to each swing by your legs
and swinging torso, alone? This input of energy is a fixed
amount with each periodic swing.
And the result is
not immediate in the case of this hammer analogy. You have to
wait until the breadth of oscillations reaches a certain
critical minimum before any action upon this hammer could begin
to happen. In the meantime, the hammer will just sit there
despite the tiny swings of the pendulum - although you might be
able to see the hammer wiggle a little, but surely not lift to
any significant height.
I agree that the
pendulum will slowly lose its momentum as it slows down and
comes to a dead halt should no one be there to periodically
lend a little push with their pinkie finger. That's a given.
And there is a very
significant requirement, here, of accurate timing. Each
periodic push to the weighted pendulum - using nothing more
than a little finger - must be timed to coincide with the
precise moment when the pendulum is rising upwards. If pushed
at any other time or in the wrong direction, the contribution
of the individual's finger will go to waste resulting in
slowing down the pendulum's swing rather than broadening its
arc (along with acquiring a sprained finger!).
I hope you have not
forgotten about gravity's contribution to this energy
equation? The fact is, it's considered 'free', because we
don't have to provide the gravity - just make use of it and
pray that it doesn't suddenly, and without warning, disappear.
For example, a sail
boat also operates on free energy. The sailor does not provide
the wind, but merely makes use of it and prays for a fair wind
and avoidance of the doldrums.
This lunch is not
entirely for free since the skillfulness of sailors and
designers of electrically oscillating circuits have to know
what they're doing to take limited advantage of forces which
are not entirely under control of their circuits, and only
within the context of their respective devices. The source of
their device's 'free' energy is outside of their device and
maintained only by the Grace of God, so to speak (or to
whomever you wish to give thanks to).
Another analogy is a
river powering a water wheel setup to grind corn: its owner and
all of the local inhabitants will pray (if they're smart
enough not to take their livelihood for granted) that their
river won't move or dry up!
So, there's nothing
free here. Just free in the sense that we don't always have to
provide everything that we make use of. Thus, results of COP
(that's an acronym for: coefficient of performance - not to
be confused with percentage of efficiency) can be greater
than one (and even as high as several hundred or more in
some cases with some overunity devices) indicating how much
contribution from the device's environment has managed to
offset the device's internal losses (measured by percentage
of efficiency) due to friction, and poor design.
So, to reiterate,
the only input of energy in an oscillating circuit - be it
mechanical or electrical, etc - is to cover losses due to
friction, etc. Any other source of energy contributing to a
device's net gain could be far greater than our contribution,
because sources outside of our control are not dependent upon
our authorship.
The lesson here is
that we don't always have to micromanage everything in our
lives unless we want to do things the hard way.
Take Huckleberry
Finn, for instance...
Huckleberry Finn
didn't pay anyone to whitewash his family's fence. He was too
smart for that. He convinced his helpers to pay himself,
instead, for the privilege to whitewash his family's fence!
Talk about an overunity situation with a COP of greater than
one, ergo: energy in does not equal energy out since Huck was
able to take a nap and end up richer than before he embarked
upon this chore assigned to him. Thank God his parental
guardian did not impose any restrictions on 'how' to perform
this chore!
You imposed upon me
a very good question. And I revel in the opportunity to respond
to it. It is a common mistake among great intellects who get
too close to their subject matter to fail to see the bigger
picture surrounding the intense interest they have in their
subject along with the failure to see their subject's
dependency, or interactions, with the environment. Every surfer
knows the value of not forgetting the contribution the
environment places upon a surfer's experience. It could be
his/her last free ride down a wave if the surfer doesn't take
the immense size of the wave into account!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at
5:28 PM, Earl C wrote:
Vinyasi,
Cool
animation, however, its a perpetual motion machine.
All
the energy imparted to the hammer must first be imparted to the
pendulum. The pendulum will lose speed (energy) when the
arm it hangs from comes down as it passes bottom dead center.
That energy will have to be replace by pushing on the pendulum
again.
The only thing this might enable would be you
could get a lot of energy out of the hammer if you locked it in
the down position, then added a little energy to the pendulum
on each swing to get it swinging very high. You could
then release the lock on the hammer, the pendulum would pick
the hammer up the next time it swung down and the hammer would
strike as the pendulum reached the top of its swing.
There may be a few progressively lighter taps of the hammer as
the pendulum slows down gradually.
The total energy of
the hammer would still be no more than the little pushes to the
pendulum added up.
TANSTAAFL (There Ain't No Such Thing
As A Free Lunch)
-----------------------------------------
From: "Vinyasi
."
To: "RAV4 EV Mailing List"
Cc:
Sent:
18-Jan-2017 22:26:30 +0000
Subject: Re: [RAV4-EV] [OT] Why
did I buy my RAV4 EV 2002 second hand but in otherwise mint
condition?
I
knew it was incomplete when I wrote it yesterday, but I was too
tired to finish. So, this morning I added this to try and make
the basic idea a little more accessible to the majority point
of view.
------------------------
To
more fully explain this principle of operating an overunity
electrical device on oscillating amperage, we must bring in a
mechanical example resulting from the work of Veljko Milković.
http://tinyurl.com/oscillating-pendulum
The
oscillating pendulum is using gravity to perform most of the
work. All that is additionally needed is to push the weighted
pendulum with a pinkie finger to gradually build up momentum
until there is sufficient energy in each swing of the pendulum
to rock the arm of the heavily weighted hammer. The swinging
pendulum represents oscillations which tie up the energy
contributed by one's pinkie, but also reduces the amount of
energy needed to rock the hammer's arm. The swinging pendulum
represents what would have been a problem had it been a
parasitic transient in the midst of an electrical transmission
line. But instead, here it is being used to reduce work that we
have to do to make the intended outcome happen. The
work of one's little pinkie finger represents the offset we
have to make up for the frictional losses of the bearings and
air drag imposed upon all of the moving parts of this system.
But the energy required to rock the hammer's heavy arm
is all done by gravity acting upon the pendulum. We need not
impose any other input of power to make the hammer rock. Bravo!
This
is a mechanical equivalent of an oscillating circuit. This is
free energy and overunity, also known as: energy entering into
the system does not equal energy coming out. The Conservation
Law of Physics has not been violated since no one is going to
bill Mother Nature for Her gravity contributing to making this
into a very profitable enterprise. Yet, we can pray that She
keeps it up!
On Tue, Jan 17,
2017 at 2:57 PM, Vinyasi wrote:
This
is way off topic and hard to take seriously by most people,
but. ....
I feel pretty good about myself for
theoretically solving a mystery. So,
here goes. ....
I
bought my classic for two reasons: I wanted to contribute to
what has
proven itself to be the best solution for going
green despite the
inconvenience of driving an electric car
in today's world of politically
correct bondage to the gas
pump (I administered a protest-oriented bike
ride over
a decade ago protesting our dependency on foreign oil). But
I
also wanted the personal inconvenience to serve as
motivation (as a
diehard activist) to see if I could
do something (no matter how small
or insignificant) to
resolve and promote a better way to integrate
electric cars
into our society.
On a side note, I finally relented and
paid for a storage unit for my
car to protect it from the
rodents chewing up my car's wiring since I
don't have a
garage and my carbag lasted less than a year before its
zipper
jammed in several places from dirt clogging its teeth in
several
spots.
Needless to say, I don't drive it too
often any more except for the
obligatory charge, drive and
recharge once in a while.
I bought my car three years
ago. But I lost my son six years ago.
Without a child to
homeschool, I decided to teach myself electrical
theory --
something I had fastidiously avoided in college for my
disgust
of equations and the apparent lack of teaching mere
basic theory (an
overview of sorts -- kind of like the
equivalent to music appreciation
but in the realm of
electrical engineering). That would have been nice
to take
as a college course if it ever existed. But I settled
on
teaching myself by - of course - lots of reading, going
to conferences,
making contact with a couple savvy
engineers, and perform a few
experiments.
One
mythological story of Nikola Tesla intrigued me to resolve
the
missing pieces which has left most people wondering if
the story is
nothing more than a work of fiction. But
something convinced me
otherwise once I dug into the history
of this particular premise.
A long time ago in a land
not so far away [here, in this country, the
United
States, in fact] telegraph operators were having problems
manning
their stations on days in which an anomaly
repeatedly occurred: they
couldn't go near their telegraph
terminal - much less touch the key - on
certain days in
which the whole system was surcharged with an enormous
excess
of energy.
Fast forward a few decades to the turn of the
last century when the two
giants of promoting electricity,
Edison and Tesla, were competing in New
York city for
customers. Tesla had his transmission system based on AC,
while
Edison was busy with DC.
But Edison was losing ground.
AC travels long distances without
dissipation better than
DC. But there's a worse nightmare saddling DC,
both its
transmission for delivering power as well as for
delivering
messages: the risk of parasitic transients
building up somewhere within
the transmission line. They
don't suck up energy from the system so much
as they tend to
blow up transformers and thus initiate blackouts.
Well,.
....
Along comes a few people who have made a diligent task
of studying the
problem of oscillating transients for the
intention to do more than
merely prevent them, but actually
go further and harness them as a
source of so-called free
energy, so-called - at least in this case -
because the
energy is not free - it was paid for - but paid for on
the
expectation (and pricing structure) that it would
be used merely once
with the expectation that more energy
would be demanded by us customemers
and priced
accordingly.
Well, what if a circuit could be designed
that captured energy for the
purpose of its reuse? Thus, the
true cost would merely be for losses due
to friction,
etc.
Such appears to be the case with a number of
inventions spanning nearly
a century:
Nikola Tesla's
Special Generator, as reported to us by William Lyne in
his
book, entitled: "Pentagon Aliens" and also
demonstrated by a coworker of a
friend of mine over ten
years ago without any explanation to speak of other
than it
worked with aluminum, copper and iron - just like Tesla's -
and
thus has been renamed by us as: Tesla's Tri-Metal
Generator.
Tesla's demonstration of a 1913 Pierce-Arrow
luxury car (weighing in at over
4,000 pounds!) driven by an
AC motor plus Tesla's mysterious circuitry
achieving normal
highway speeds.
The Nazi's use of Tesla's invention in
some of their U-boats giving them a
range of 30,000 miles.
This is where it gets interesting since the one solid
clue
we have of this technology is William Lyne's quotation of a Mr.
Dort, sr.
who worked with Tesla in developing this system
for the Nazis (Tesla was short
of funds at this stage of his
life and didn't mind too much working for the
Germans since
they had already stole some of his patents, outright). To
with...
"For every 200 pounds of iron added to this
device, one horsepower output is
added".
My
friend's coworker ran a medium sized motor from a project box
the size and
shape of a notebook. The only indulgence this
coworker made to my friend over
a decade ago for sharing
some insight into its construction was the cryptic
answer
that it incorporated the use of copper, iron and aluminum in
its
construction. My friend never saw this coworker
again.
Jim Murray's use of synchronous generators to
save Bethlehem Steel of Michigan
thousands of dollars a
month for saving them from the price gauging which the
local
power company had been performing on billing the company for
the use of
power to merely warm up the magnetic field coils
on their rock moving
equipment's motors. This power is
eventually returned back into the grid (minus
any losses)
when the motors shut down. But that didn't stop the power
company
from forcing Bethlehem Steel to shut down
their synchronous generator when Jim
Murray left them to
pursue other work.
Jim went to develop his Dynaflux
Alternator, his SERPS switching technology,
and his
transforming generator to continue to develop this concept of
recycling
our use of electrical
energy.
http://TeslasHiddenDiscoveries.com/
http://DynafluxAlternator.com/
Well...
Along
comes two young inventors from the Portugese district of Brazil
who have
managed to design a circuit suitable for either AC
or DC output which uses
the potential difference between two
sets of grounding rods to drive the
amperage within a simple
continuous loop of wire in the heart of their circuit
to
supply the circuit's load with whatever amount of energy is
required - the
caveat being that the wire gauges have to be
thick enough to not overheat!
The fact that weak geomagnetic
locations require the user to compensate by
enlarging the
mass of one of the two sets of grounding rods (each set
is
connected in series to all other rods within its set),
plus the fact that the
only English speaking person (who is
located here in the US) who has been the
first to
successfully replicate this device insists that all of these
rods
must be copper clad steel. In other words, Tesla's
quote of increasing his
Special Generator's output by
increasing the mass of its use of iron is
refected here.
This is the best I can do to hint at a possible reincarnation
of
Tesla's Special Generator in the guise of the Earth
Captor of Barbosa and Leal,
but close enough to have me all
enthused!
http://barbosalealearthcaptor.blogspot.com/
~~~~~~~
Vinyasi
--
Vinyasi
My
Resumé - GoFundMe
As
Maharishi said, "laughter is the highest state of
consciousness."
Keep laughing,
dear Vinyasi. It's a beautiful sight when you do. --- Marty
Zucker, coauthor of "Earthing".
--
Vinyasi
As
Maharishi said, "laughter is the highest state of
consciousness."
Keep laughing, dear
Vinyasi. It's a beautiful sight when you do. --- Marty Zucker,
coauthor of "Earthing".
|
|
|
