Barbosa and Leal Developed as a Bionic Device

I started a new message thread over at Energetic Forum devoted to my developmental experimentation of B&L via bionic testing. Kind of like muscle testing among chiropractors in that I allow my subconsciousness to become impacted by whatever influence this device – WHEN SWITCHED OFF! – will have upon my wakeful awareness during the following daytime.

I don't possess fancy shop equipment nor the skill to use them. All I ever use are a basic meter to test for continuity (have I connected two wires together, or am I kidding myself?), and simple inferences such as: the use of LEDs to test for the presence of amperage flowing in any position of the circuit relative to any other position with a similar LED placed there and which way does it flow? But my most important piece of equipment is the sensitivity of my own body, coupled with my intuition and limited expertise for interpreting results and what to do next. For this latter factor I owe my debt to the fortuitous discovery of other peoples' thoughts and experiences on specific instances which are relevant to my study.

After testing out the circuit, above, and its overunity analog with neon bulb / resistor or resistor alone, below ...

... I've come to the conclusion that the 'idle mode' for this device is unity or less than unity, but not overunity due to its symmetry and lack of overunity whenever its neon bulb is missing....

This latter condition is ideal for sleeping wherein the body wants to achieve balance during its period of rest. Overunity is a condition of asymmetry ideal for achieving Coefficients of Performance greater than one, but lousy for achieving deep rest, or any rest. Instead and more than likely, a condition ripe for a stroke will be the result of sleeping in a condition of asymmetry.

Plating on Plastic, Shell, Wood, Glass, Gold Plating

This might be useful to know on how to plate glass, or any other dielectric, with aluminum or iron film to create the sandwiched ground references to serve as “common ground” to replace the Earth grounds of Barbosa and Leal.

Building my first full scale modified B&L.

Towards the end of the video, up above, I mention that I needed to balance the load by replicating equivalent resistances twice more at each of the toroids so that all three match their resistances with each other. And I mentioned that this circuit is like an AC transmission line in which the top two horizontal paths for electricity (to travel along) are the transmission lines and the two toroids and the load at the far right are three shorts, or shunts, each of whose resistances must match each other if I'm to see the load's LED/s light up at all. Otherwise, all of the amperage will flow down both toroids and avoid traveling down the load's LED/s causing the LED/s at the power source – my little Sota Instruments AC Zapper – to light up, but nothing else indicating a short of some kind. Now, maybe this is the way it's supposed to be? Maybe all of the power is supposed to travel down each of the windings of both toroids and avoid the load's LED/s? I don't know..... Or, at least, this was what I thought before I started to, actually, build myself a circuit to test. That is when I discovered that I might be wrong, because this circuit is supposed to have various modes of operation not the least of which is whenever the two “grounded” voltage references, common or Earth grounds, are at zero state – which is where I'm at in the development of this circuit at the moment.

Now, there's an interesting thought which occurred to me as to what type of resistance should I have along each of these three locations.

What if I counterpoise two DC motors facing each other (in reverse polarity with respect to how their wirings are connected inline to each other) and surround them on either side with two diodes – each of whom are pointing towards the motors at their collective center? And this constitutes the parallel shunt across the two ends of each toroid's windings? Like this...

The idea, here, is to collect electron "holes", Tesla's radiant energy, between the two diodes and process them into new electrons – within the magnetic fields of the two DC motors' windings – to serve as added amperage powering the circuit. Then, maybe the circuit won't need any “load balancing”?

BTW, Chuck C Stanley answered my question on how to respectively treat LEDs by keeping their amperage under 20 mA and between 1.8 to 2.2 V with a 220 ohm resistor.

I'm guessing that a pair of DC motors could be coupled in parallel with each toroid, surrounded by diodes pointing inwards, and a resistor could be added to each end of a toroid to match the total resistance across each motor/diode pair? Maybe this will do something interesting? Such as, boost the conversion of electron holes into electron flow within the confines of each toroid's magnetic field? I don't know... But I have to keep conjecturing or else give up development.

The axle of each motor is not hooked up to anything, but is allowed to spin freely.

What if it matters whether the frequency is low or high? I suspect that the choice for a mass of magnetizable material may rest upon this criteria resulting in iron for low frequencies (the last diagram, above) versus aluminum for high frequencies (the following diagram)...

Here is a post explaining why I think so...

Or better yet, maybe it's better to encourage high frequencies over low by positioning the aluminum as the core and making the iron a surrounding cover for the aluminum? Both substances are coated with a thin veneer of electroplated copper and an insulating space lies between them and the outside...

Free energy is the magnification of personal power.

Perpetual Technique is at the Heart of every Free Energy Machine, not Perpetual Motion.

Dear Physics Girl,

https://www.youtube.com/user/physicswoman

It is an abuse of the English language to call any machine perpetual motion when every true machine perpetually uses technique to harness free energy.

Take the lever of Archimedes. It is not perpetual, because we can explain it. Yet, it harnesses free energy of leverage to move objects heavier than what we could otherwise move. It is perpetually capable of doing this provided we don't stop for tea and the lever doesn't break! Butt it is definitely not a perpetual motion machine, because we can explain it using common principles of mechanical dynamics.

Just because energy is for free, doesn't mean we have to bad mouth devices we cannot explain.

Stanley Meyer's Dune Buggy made synthetic ammonia on demand by blending hydrogen |split from water| and mono-atomic nitrogen |from his air intake| by first ionizing these two gases with a high voltage positive charge in the vicinity of 70,000 volts - just like Herman Anderson did to his modified ICE (internal combustion engine).

Petros Zografos, Peter Painter, of Greece bubbles air through his electrolytic chamber to fulfill the 1807 quote of Sir Humphry Davy in which "electrolytic hydrogen will combine with nitrogen in the presence of water, while ordinary hydrogen will not."

http://tinyurl.com/humphry-davy

http://tinyurl.com/humphry-davy2

Barbosa and Leal's Earth Captor could just as easily capture its Earth energy by magnetizing a very large mass of iron and use that as one plate of a capacitor to create a voltage difference with another iron plate much smaller than the first (through the use of the magneto-motive force) without using any watts, or the Earth, to do this.

We could go on and on with free energy examples which can be explained with common knowledge and, thus, dispel the notion that every machine designed to be against the profit motive of vested interests does not have to suffer the indignity of mislabeling via abuse of English.

In response to...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b8ZsFszE8I&t=206s

Geomagnetism is not the only Source of B&L's Energy

The two sets of steel grounding rods must be close enough to electrostatically “feel” each other to register a voltage difference between them. And there must be a strong enough geomagnetic field flowing between them to “blow out” any chance for arcing to occur which could neutralize their voltage difference. A dry soil will also help in this regard.

It is their difference in mass which conveys this voltage difference between them acquired from the Earth and from their magneto-motive reactions to the oscillations built up between them originating from within the circuit of Barbosa and Leal. It is this circuit which is the source of oscillations throughout its entire design manifesting in all of its parts not the least of which lies between these two sets of grounding rods.

Geomagnetism prevents obliteration of voltage between these two sets of rods by supplying them with immunity from decay while magnetizing them at the same time in addition to magneto-motive force built up from controlled oscillations emanating from within the circuitry of Barbosa and Leal.

An analogy exists from within Richard Hackenberger's last edition of the EV Gray motor according to its assessment by Mark McKay.

Compressed air (analogous to the flow of geomagnetism) was forced through the interior of the EV Gray motor to prevent arcing between the aluminum chassis (lined on its interior surface with Teflon) and the aluminum supports underneath the rotor/stator coils. These aluminum supports were insulated from their immediate surroundings so as to become dielectrically isolated from all other parts of the motor (including the chassis whose voltage potential just happened to be in opposition to these inner support pieces). Yet, it was the electrostatic field surrounding the rotor and stator coils which fed the polarizing charge built up among these inner supports and the chassis of the motor so long as sufficient air kept blowing in through this motor's interior to prevent arcing and an elimination of electrostatic charge existing between the chassis and these aluminum supports. This electrostatic field contributed to the motor's overunity performance as an oscillatory response to this motor's operation. This response did not go unnoticed by the motor's output despite a lack of direct connection between these two “floating” capacitor plates and the circuitry of the motor.

The Electric Keeper of B&L has to be driven by something. The contribution of voltage supplied by the AC Sinewave Inverter is one source. The Earth is the other. The Earth provides isolation so that an electrostatic buildup can occur among the two sets of grounding rods: isolation via a dry soil, but most importantly isolation between two differing masses of ferromagnetizable material possessing a potential difference of magneto-motive force (not to be confused with electro-motive force although this latter will be the end result).

Tesla used magnetic fields to quench a spark gap. The Earth, here, does the same.

UnEarthing Barbosa and Leal's Earth Captor, version 28 Jan 2017