Schematic of Photo Inset

Referenced post at Energetic Forum

This is NOT the Secret for Aerial Electricity by Sangulani Maxwell Chikumbutso of Saith Technologies

https://is.gd/aerialmax
https://is.gd/aerialmaxpic

Ambient Power Collector
http://www.wavenology.com/?page_id=172

Parametric Metamaterial
http://www.wavenology.com/?page_id=186#4

Reverse Engineering Secret Method for Amplifying Aerial Electricity by Sangulani Maxwell Chikumbutso

Trapezoidal approximations were accidentally allowed within the following simulations ...

https://is.gd/maxneon
https://is.gd/max_neon

No trapezoidal approximations were allowed to occur within these two simulations ...

https://is.gd/neonmax
https://is.gd/neon_max
https://is.gd/neonmaxpic

https://is.gd/numosc

These four simulations are my attempt to understand the secret to Saith Technologies' Aerial Extraction of Energy invented by Sangulani Maxwell Chikumbutso of Zimbabwe, Africa.

I believe that a gas discharge tube provides a pathway of ions not unlike that which precedes a thunderbolt. A simple neon bulb, plus the judicious use of transformers, may be at the heart of his amplification of aerial reception of electrical power resident all around us. My simulations in this video exemplify this possibility. I am certain of it.

As for his inability to patent his technology, I find shame in the patent system who espouses physics. Yet, it is within physics that Conservation of Energy must bow in humility before time before commanding anyone to adhere to its short-sided principles of limiting our use of Immortal Energy.

https://is.gd/timeisenergy

This is self-evident to anyone who has invoked the theorem of Emmy Noether.

https://is.gd/noetherstheorem

It is my wish that no one disgrace physics ever again by decrying the hope which all well wishers of free energy may aspire to. This is my quest now that I have solved other riddles: the riddle of argyria and the riddle of infinite golden ratios.

http://tinyurl.com/silver-resume

There is no reason - no good reason - why we should continue to suffer for lack of free energy or lack of good, affordable, homegrown health care. Name me a price and I'll name you a greater one: the cost of ignorance and slavery to superstition.

Aerial Energy

https://is.gd/aerial_energy

Downloaded and saved onto your computer and then loaded into ...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Not much different from my latest simulations of free energy. Instead of an initial kickstart to the simulation using the nose (the front end; the positive pole) of a battery, I use an aerial. But most of the energy for running this simulation is supplied by the circuit itself.

There's one caveat, though...

My simulations are not being taken seriously since they appear to be violating the politically correct version of physics, namely: ignore time shifts (dilations) and ignore Emmy Noether ...

Consequently, trapezoidal approximations within the simulator's calculations is being blamed as just one of many reasons not to take these simulations of mine seriously. They're to be considered a novelty at best.

Yet, they've taught me the physics behind these simulations by providing a training ground to help me know what to look for in science to help explain these phenomena. So, I don't take my critiques too seriously. Yet, I'm starting to use Spice for all of my future simulations as you'll get to see in a little while after today, the 6^th of May 2017.



For a synopsis of how these simulations can create energy without violating the laws of physics, see ...



https://is.gd/timeisenergy

Time equals Energy - Synopsis

The reversibility of phase conjugation makes it possible to make more time from time and more energy from energy provided you have some time, or energy, to make time/energy from. I don't know how to make time or energy from nothing. But if you have some of either, more can be made from those fixed amounts with the judicious use of phase conjugation, wave discontinuity, magnetic hysteresis, inductive kickback and dissonant timing in a closed loop.

Dissonant timing results from time lags imposed by the ultra-low capacitors and the mass of iron in the coil of wire (transformer core). These two influences of electric and magnetic time lag incur an out-of-phase relationship among the parent and their daughter waves. This state of asynchronicity is ideal for boosting surges within the confines of these simulations. Oddly enough, nice neat and clean tidy sine waves resulting from tank circuit methodologies don't work, here. The oscilliscope should look like a wash of color as if someone had brushed a broad paint brush across the scope's window.

The ultra-thin dielectric of the capacitors causes waves transmitted through them to slow down just as light passing through denser material slows down and refracts. By comparison to the reflected portion of the split parent wave, the transmitted portion will lag behind the reflected portion to return to this same position a little late as both traverse around the confines of the closed loop encapsulating their travels.

The magnetic field of the iron cored, coil of wire also maintains a time lag for slowing down the magnetic component of a wave as it passes through its adjoining coil. And the more massive is the core, the more the wave will get slowed down. In the words of the Master - Nikola Tesla, "for every two hundred pounds of iron added to the device, one horsepower is increased" -- William Lyne, from his book: "Pentagon Aliens" in the chapter concerning Tesla's Special Generator, ...

https://is.gd/teslaspecialgen

... also known as his Tri-Metal Generator for its use of aluminum, copper and iron.

These are my bullet points upon which is based my theory of infinite time, and for that matter - infinite energy, from a finite quantity of both as they are derived from my simulations.

Forget E = MC squared. That's a distraction to lull you into submitting to the sole authority of free energy derived from high powered physics, alone. We can do it from electricity; from the voltage difference between my nose and my toe. It doesn't take much - energy or intelligence - to "get it". It's really quite simple.

We don't have to invoke zero point energy from the vacuum, or the aether, or fraud, or whatever.

If you want to invoke anything, invoke Emmy Noether - not her whole theorem; ...

https://is.gd/wiki_noether

... just a tiny portion of it ...

... having to do with the exception to the rule of Conservation of Energy. The exemption that time shifts - time dilation - takes when it comes to balancing out the accounting of time in equals time out; or, energy in equals energy out. Time and energy are exempt from conservation of either whenever either are shifted in time.

That's it.

Free Energy from only one Transformer driving Air Core Coils, v. 2

This is the 2nd corrected version of this video predicated on the following simulation ...
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic

And is a further development of ...
https://is.gd/free_energy
... and ...
https://is.gd/free_energy2

Whose instructions for execution are ...
https://is.gd/freeenergypic
... and ...
https://is.gd/free_energy2_info
... respectively.

Unlike the prior simulations, though, this one only uses one transformer and exhibits a slower escalation rate towards infinity more similar to this earlier simulation ...
https://is.gd/perpetual_motion

Which, of course, is not actual perpetual stability, but is very very slow at rising towards infinite output.

All of my best simulations are zipped up at ...
https://is.gd/is_this_realistic

And the videos on trying to analyze why these simulations work at all, using standard conventional wisdom, are ...
Pt.1 ...
https://youtu.be/jFCkzYqnO2w

Pt.2 ...
https://youtu.be/5oVL7UXAH3g

Pt.3 ...
https://youtu.be/U1cXRIzTQAc

Free Energy from only one Transformer driving Air-Core Coils, v. 1

This simulation is predicated on ...
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic

And is a further development of ...
https://is.gd/free_energy
... and ...
https://is.gd/free_energy2

Whose instructions for execution are ...
https://is.gd/freeenergypic
... and ...
https://is.gd/free_energy2_info
... respectively.

Unlike the prior simulations, though, this one only uses one transformer and exhibits a slower escalation rate towards infinity more similar to this earlier simulation ...
https://is.gd/perpetual_motion

Which, of course, is not actual perpetual stability, but is very very slow at rising towards infinite output.

All of my best simulations are zipped up at ...
https://is.gd/is_this_realistic

And the videos on trying to analyze why these simulations work at all, using standard conventional wisdom, are ...
Pt.1 ...
https://youtu.be/jFCkzYqnO2w

Pt.2 ...
https://youtu.be/5oVL7UXAH3g

Pt.3 ...
https://youtu.be/U1cXRIzTQAc

Electrical Immortality Defines Free Energy, pt. 3

I've finally got this ideology shortened down a bit in this video despite my rambling. My next video, pt.4, will be even more succinct with slides and kept short.

Pt.1 was ...
https://youtu.be/jFCkzYqnO2w

Pt.2 was ...
https://youtu.be/5oVL7UXAH3g

What is Free Energy?
Free energy emanates out of a condition of phase conjugation. One of the additional benefits is limited immortality: we've managed to buy a block of time to semi-immortalize the electrical energy within our circuit. So naturally, it's going to have a little bit more energy to spend as well.

Three main points:

1. Wave Discontinuity and

2. Acceleration, Amplification

3. Within two Closed Loops

3a. An electrical loop composed of two weak capacitors and at least one toroidal iron core coils.

3b. At least one magnetic sub-loop composed of the iron cored coils whose magnetic fields remember the original torque of its parent wave and puts the torque back into its daughter waves at a value nearly equal to its parent's if we do this right with minimal losses due to inefficiencies.

Terse definition of free energy ...
Physics must be obeyed. Allowance is made for non-conservation of energy via Noether's theorem. Phase conjugation alters time for a wave of energy caught in a closed loop of discontinuity imposed by low-level capacitors and accelerated by toroidal iron core inductors.

Fleshed out at Scribd ...
https://is.gd/free_energy_text

Zipped repository for these free energy simulations ...
https://is.gd/is_this_realistic

Stills and citations used in my presentations ...
https://is.gd/wave_discontinuity

Electrical Immortality Defines Free Energy, pt. 2

Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Who says energy is not immortal?

An Intuitive Explanation of Phase Conjugation
http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/PhaseConjugate/PhaseConjugate.html

These presentations are predicated on these simple experiments ...
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic2

... which exhibits discontinuity by splitting waves by way of reflection and transmitance using very low-level capacitors, then accelerating these shortened wave lengths by way of inductance, and adding surges via mechanical switching within the following simulations ...

https://is.gd/free_energy
https://is.gd/free_energy2

... loaded into this simulator ...

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

These surges add an element of randomness rendering the overall electrical picture into a sea of controlled chaos.

Immortality is a function of frequency. Energy is the benefit of life. Mortality from lack of energy does not negate frequency. Rather, it is the other way around: a lowered frequency hastens the death of a circuit by reduction of its energy, because frequency equals energy. The higher the frequency, the more energy a wave contains. The lower the frequency, the less energy a wave contains. By raising frequency, each wave packs more energy at the expense of speed (also known as: amperage). That's where the two transformers enter the picture in these simulations. They re-accelerate sluggish waves which have been split by low-level capacitors of one pico Farad, or less, exercising the principle of Discontinuity of transmission lines (look it up on Wikipedia) ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflections_of_signals_on_conducting_lines#Discontinuity_along_line
https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/what-deal-low-capacitance-cables/
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/96apr/apr96a11.pdf

What's the value of chaos? A tank circuit has a predetermined point at which it will run itself down, because the waves are all uniform and predictable as to what they will do next. Predictable waves have phase relations which are uniform, thus limiting their split clones into exclusively discrete, shorter wave lengths rather than a multitude of possible lengths as the result of chaotic surges. So long as all waves are harmonics (even divisors or even multiples) of each other, so long can these simulations either run themselves up to a meltdown, or just as easily lose all of their momentum to internal resistance and satisfy the Conservation Law of Thermodynamics by running themselves down to zero. But with the help of surges, chaos insures the existence of discrete plateaus at which these simulations can hang out at should the operator guide them there ...

https://is.gd/free_energy2_info
https://is.gd/freeenergypic

... thus immortalizing these simulations to last forever and avoid either meltdown or rundown resulting from over-abundance or depletion of energy! Although surges are by their very nature chaotic, the reaction (on the part of electrical dynamics to the presence of surging chaos) is to respond with discrete plateaus at which energy can either gradually dissipate or gradually increase. These plateaus could be considered phase transitions in which the tendency for energy values to rapidly change (either up or down) is retarded rather than allowed to wildly fluctuate. This allows a little breathing room in which the operator can take a break. For without these plateaus, these simulations tend to alter their output rather quickly - too quickly to manage without the help of chaos retarding their acceleration to spontaneous combustion.

Ultimately, it is time which determines energy. For it is frequency which determines the rate at which a wave of energy will decay to zero. But by constantly adding more waves of shorter wave lengths of mixed polarities using the discontinuity of extremely low-level capacitors of 1pF or less, and by accelerating shortened waves by improving their amperage with a pair of transformers in a closed loop, and by adding surges of chaos, the collective death of all waves within these simulations can be put off, indefinitely.

BTW, the persistent overshoot tendency for these simulations to rise to infinite output (especially, in: is-this-realistic) is accumulative due to the discontinuity resulting from the use of low-level capacitors boxed into a closed loop between two transformers. Conventionally, overshoots would die down. But not here. Each overshoot is layered upon the prior before the prior has a chance to completely decay, thus insuring immortality for the accumulation of overshoots ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overshoot_(signal)

Repository for all of the simulation files, posted above, in one zip file ...
https://is.gd/is_this_realistic

Stills and citations ...
https://is.gd/wave_discontinuity
... used in pt.1 of my presentation ...
https://youtu.be/jFCkzYqnO2w

Electrical Immortality Defines Free Energy, pt. 1

Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Who says energy is not immortal?

An Intuitive Explanation of Phase Conjugation
http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/PhaseConjugate/PhaseConjugate.html

These presentations are predicated on these simple experiments ...
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic
http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic2

... and attempts to explain, in electrodynamic conventional terms, how it could be possible that my examples of free energy production cited below could produce infinite energy from a finite quantity of energy in which the power source acts as a mere spur rather than as a continuous supply. This redefines a power source as a permission to initiate activity. Once initiated, permission is no longer needed to maintain the circuit examples, below. They flourish very well on their own independent of any source including the source which initiated their active state.

If this doesn't violate the Conservation Law of Physics, then maybe it's because the Conservation Law only pertains to certain conditions to which the examples, below, do not apply? Namely, the conventional condition of Wave Continuity within the context of capacitors exclusively acting as agents for the reflection of a wave and never for both reflection and transmission - especially within a closed loop transmission line between two transformers.

The Delayed Lenz Effect is the result of this Wave Discontinuity, because the split waves never resolve and, instead, amplify between two juxtaposed transformers magnifying their continuous breakdown. Continuity is a byproduct of consistency over time. Repeated breakdowns of each wave - as they pass through each capacitor - worsens their discontinuity and delays resolution, indefinitely. If resolution is never allowed to occur, then power within these simulations can magnify to infinity!

Stills and citations used in this presentation ...
https://is.gd/wave_discontinuity

Examples of this presentation ...
https://is.gd/free_energy
https://is.gd/freeenergypic

https://is.gd/free_energy2
https://is.gd/free_energy2_info

Loaded into this simulator ...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Zipped simulation files ...
https://is.gd/is_this_realistic

“Renormalization specifies relationships between parameters in the theory when the parameters describing large distance scales differ from the parameters describing small distances. Physically, the pileup of contributions from an infinity of scales involved in a problem may then result in infinities.” - Wikipedia

Multiplication of frequency, within these simulations, is the domain of 'pileup of contributions from an infinity of scales' resulting in an infinity of time for the existence of this circuit's energy. With an infinity of time with which to exist, this circuit has all of the energy it needs to spend in a potentially immortal state.

All circuits expend energy during the course of their lifespan. This circuit's lifespan is no exception to this rule.

This circuit manufactures its own time by the adroit manipulation of frequency and thus could live forever.

It does not make energy; it makes time. Energy is its body existing in time. That's why a little energy has to be initially given to it at the user's cost to give it some life.

But time is its existence.

Time is increased within the domain of this circuit's consciousness. This domain is bounded by its energy.

Energy is its manifestation of consciousness just as water is our physical consciousness since our bodies are mostly made of water. But electrical energy is this circuit's primary substance for the construction of its body. This circuit's simulation is merely its skeletal structure fleshed out by the addition of electrical energy which is its muscle and bloodstream and nervous system, etc.

More energy is the result of more time to exist; not its cause. Free energy is the result while time is the cause. Without time, nothing could exist - not even an idea.

Internalized Time Reference Created by the Frequencies of its Waves?

I suspect that these simulations have their own time frame based - not on the simulator's clock, but - on the composition of frequencies undergoing constant alteration which effectively shifts time for the dynamics of these simulations giving the illusion (to the observer) of the creation of free energy when in reality the simulation may merely be speeding up its internal reference for time! If this is true, then a new variable enters the Laws of Physics: this being the primary alteration of time altering everything else including the alteration of energy as a secondary consequence.

Reassessment of 'Classification scheme held for perpetual motion machines of the first kind' is the distinction that they purport to do work without the *continuous* input of energy. Exceptions to this class are perpetual motion machines of the first kind who purport to do work without an *initial* input of energy.

Pt. 2 of this video series ...
https://youtu.be/5oVL7UXAH3g

The Simplest Way to Create Free Energy for Ourselves is to Make our own Capacitors.

Free Energy, v.2 - Simulator Instructions

I was prompted by two individuals to renovate my free energy simulation to include instructions for its operation not unlike the need to seek Driver's Ed whenever wanting to learn to drive a car. A potentiometer is included which allows for adjustment of resistance down or up which translates into the output of the simulation likewise going up or down. By playing with these modulations, it is possible to get a solid output to any degree of infinity desirable.

https://is.gd/free_energy2_info

https://is.gd/free_energy2
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Philip Nelson and analysis of public address systems. Anything can be made out of anything.

The Theory of Infinite Anything is no different than Einstein's Theory of Relativity. If Ee equals Em times Cee squared for fusion and fission reactions at the nuclear level, then why not something similar for electrical and magnetic dynamics as well?

Electrical and magnetic dynamics comes out of the copper and iron and dielectric plastic and glass and ceramic and what not within our electrical circuits. It does not come from the power source alone. That plays a significant role, but is only one player in this drama. Ultimately, the symphonic performance won't get played without its players. In other words, the orchestral conductor is not enough to make music. It is these copper and iron and ceramic (dielectrics within capacitors) who perform the electrical and magnetic presentation. The power source is the role of a symphonic conductor giving his/her own interpretation of the composer's work - but not creating it. So, although the power company bills us for its delivery of our appliances' daily performances, it is our appliances who are the real celebrities. Without them, electrical dynamics would never flourish.

I say this because surges can arise from within a circuit resulting in oscillations which could escalate towards infinite values of wattage and amperage, etc. This requalifies the role of the material substances within the circuit as being more significant than the power source.

Surges and Oscillations : that's what my investigation into Free Energy is all about.

Lamentations of a Free Energy Rock Hound

What would happen to the American work force stuck in rush hour parking lot traffic if EVs got their lunch for free? They'd quit their job and become an EV or else retire early as an American worker.

Free Energy from Momentary Contact with the Positive Terminal of a 1.5V ...

https://is.gd/free_energy
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

https://is.gd/freeenergypic

Sunburst Simulation of Free Energy from a Twelve Volt Battery giving Tens of Volts and Micro Watts

https://is.gd/sunBurst
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

More Amps with Less Volts at an Extremely Slow, Slow, Slow Rate of Escalation towards Infinity

https://is.gd/moreamps
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

A little bit preloaded by having saved a fresh version after it had run for 10 kilo seconds...
https://is.gd/beta_amps

The Slowest 'Burn Rate' Escalating Upwards Towards Infinity That I've Ever Seen in any of These Simulations!

https://is.gd/HVAC_COIL2
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

This is the slowest spontaneous combustion escalating upwards towards infinity that I've ever seen simulated based on Eric Dollard's analog computer in LMD mode - Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric; a Tesla coil in miniature; intended to highlight one aspect of a transmission line: its capacitance. Thus, high voltage is born, at the sacrifice of amperage, from a very very small supply at this circuit's DC source. In fact, the DC source herein is so small, I'd have a hard time finding it! Yet, this circuit wouldn't work without the battery rated at 12 volts. One volt less and the circuit won't work. It's that delicately balanced that just about every variable in this setup is necessary to succeed at producing a very slow escalation towards an infinitely combustible outcome.

High Voltage, Low Amperage without any cost from a Battery - a Perpetual Simulation!

This simulation uses next to no watts from a 12 volt DC battery. In fact, it charges the battery at a rate of negative 1.4 nano watts to be precise. Its output is over 1 kV and around 26 micro amps (approximately 20 milli watts of power), continually, without much variation by comparison to my earlier attempts at simulating overunity.

https://is.gd/HVAC_COIL
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Quote...
"Overall, higher voltage systems will actually be more efficient and more cost-effective, whether DC or AC. Losses in electrical circuits are based on the amperage (electron flow). You can move more energy (kWh) with lower amperage by running it at higher voltage. This is why utility transmission lines run in the thousands of volts, and homes at 120/240 volts. Higher voltage means lower losses with the same size wire, or the same losses with much smaller wire. Copper wire is costly, so higher voltage saves you dollars up front, as well as energy losses throughout the life of the system."

https://www.homepower.com/articles/solar-electricity/design-installation/ask-experts-12-volt-power

Is this a realistic EV? Powered by nano watts from a 10 volt, open path, DC source.

https://is.gd/is_this_a_realistic_EV
https://is.gd/blankcanvas
http://emediapress.com/aaronmurakami/coldelectricity/

 

Economical EV or economical Tesla Coil using an open path 10 volt DC power supply.

https://is.gd/economical_EV
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Regenerating Dead, Dry Cell Batteries with Radiant Energy - aka Cold Electricity

This is the beginning of an experiment in which I will see if I can regenerate - not recharge - two dead batteries starting out at a voltage of 480mV for the top left battery and 387.9mV for the bottom right battery using only one wire to connect each to its positive terminal. I will be periodically updating the photo above with additional voltage readings. This experiment is inspired by my having stumbled upon an accidental recharging/regeneration of a brand new battery in the course of successfully healing my deep wound using Dr. Robert Otto Becker, MD's, knowledge from chapter seven of his book, entitled: "The Body Electric".

Update...
This experiment merely resulted in depleting one of these two batteries - the one on the lower left - by a few millivolts due to that side of the circuit not being grounded as compared to the top side being grounded. So, this experiment is temporarily, or permanently, on hold until I can figure out what next to try.

Electrostatic Power Source from Eric Dollard's LMD analog computer emulating a Tesla Coil.

https://is.gd/1st_EV
https://is.gd/2nd_EV
https://is.gd/megaEV

The binary text files listed above are each loaded into this simulator...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Simulating my pleasant dreams of electrical overunity as a pastime.

Put the source adjacent to the load in an overunity device to moderately clamp its infinite output.

Gabriel Kron, Negative Resistance and the Open Path.

Infinite output powering two EV motor loads in under 3 milliseconds!

https://is.gd/openpath
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Jurassic Park's Chaos Theory - Life Wants to Break Free - Explains Negative Resistance & Free Energy

http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic

~and~

https://is.gd/killerAMPS
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Is this realistic? Killer Amps!

http://tinyurl.com/is-this-realistic

https://is.gd/killerAMPS
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Maintaining two ammeters above 200 Amps, averaged, using Eric Dollard's analog computer: TEM & LMD.

I got better results doubling my EV motors and taking the arithmetic average between them to guide my manually toggling, back and forth, between self-runner mode as distinguished from being powered by the DC battery source of 250 volts. And I think the TEM stack of LMD modules may be helping to equalize the two ammeter readouts?

https://is.gd/1LMD_2TEM
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Although the four central capacitors are under strain, and they're amperage and voltage are 180 degrees out of phase, ...

... the inductors representing the two motors only have their voltage waves undulating wide and narrow and completely in phase with each other while their amperage waves are a flat line of very gradual deescalation.

And of course, the voltage across the motors are exceedingly high at around several Mega volts.

a YouTube video...

Rock-Steady Filtration of Undulating Oscillations is my Simple Analysis of Barbosa and Leal.

Barbosa and Leal effectively create oscillations within the Earth between two sets of grounding rods, and then transfers this contribution upwards, above ground, to the circuitry of the Captor Loop's two transformers whose job is to clean up the undulating values of the Earth's oscillations into rock-steady power for our appliances (which we've come to expect of our power source). So, we could have used Eric Dollard's LMD module to bypass any need for utilizing the Earth by just powering up at least one LMD module. But not without passing that energy through the circuitry of B&L to clean it up and stabilize it for a load.

Successful production of targeted amperage for an EV Motor = ~200 Amps.

https://is.gd/successful_AMPS
https://is.gd/blankcanvas
vs
https://is.gd/conventional_EV

KaBoom ! !

Here's a way to blow up a power supply for an electric motor: use this circuit and toggle the switch twice to produce amperage overload...

As with many of my simulations, first download this small binary text file and save it onto your device: https://is.gd/kaboom, then load it into this simulator: https://is.gd/blankcanvas.

Perpetual Motion? Nope. Close to Perpetual Overunity. Slow Spontaneous Combustion.

One of my simulations of free energy in the confines of a simulator. Not very realistic since it fries itself within fifty minutes. But a lot better than some of my other versions of Eric Dollard's LMD module which fried themselves in a fraction of a second.

LMD = Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric; acronym for an analog computer of an AC transmission line; in contradistinction to TEM = Transverse Electro-Magnetic or standard transmission line.

The technical term appropriate for this situation, instead of using the word: 'fry' is to use the term: 'spontaneous combustion' resulting from a parasitic oscillation. These latter phenomena plagued DC transmission lines of the Edison Power Company in New York city a century ago before they called in a specialist by the name of Steinmetz to fix the problem. Well, I'm trying to harness it!

https://is.gd/perpetual_motion

Recharging batteries is the sole useful purpose of a spontaneously combustible, free energy LMD, ...

... , because this circuit does not self-run at anything less than Mega or Giga Amps. So, it must always be pulsed between alternate phases of drawing voltage from its DC source versus self-running disconnected from that source in such a manner as to regulate its ability to fry itself with too much amperage. Amperage is what this device freely manifests at any fixed voltage. And amperage is what will toast every component connected to this circuit.

CORRECTION...
Actually, the battery pack on my 2002, first generation, RAV4 EV recharges at a rate of one tenth the amperage to which it spends during driving. So, I cannot focus my efforts on merely charging the batteries as I drive. I have to focus on powering the motor's needs instead.

From where does Free Energy come? Wrong question! Intelligence travels down the wire if allowed to.

Updates on completing my first series of simulations of Eric Dollard's LMD with Filament Lamps.

I'm at the point, now, in my research that it's beginning to look like a circuit which undergoes phases between a few alternate switching states in order to mimic balance between overunity and conventional underunity since neither of these two states can linger forever without killing the circuit either through lack of energy or spontaneous combustion resulting from too much energy. Since my goal was always to see if I can simulate a free energy device which could extend the range per charge on my electric car, or else make the range infinite, it's starting to look like I will also have to pulse the motor since the circuit won't be available, continuously, to provide power without switching the connection between the motor and the circuit ON and OFF while I alternate the circuit's internal switching arrangements. Thus, it's also starting to look like an EV Gray motor. For this, I am indebted to the analysis of Mark McKay...

http://tinyurl.com/evgray

Curbing vagrant out-of-control overunity oscillations with high frequency pulses.

Funnily enough, the best way to control and put the brakes on free energy is by applying a frequency higher than the oscillations themselves. Continuous D.C. is worse! It allows for auto-induced oscillations and their rapid escalation. And allowing a device to self-run, by connecting the output with the input, is just as bad as applying continuous DC, because in both situations, liberty to oscillate becomes the norm rather than the exception.

Parasitic oscillators have their own rule of thumb for transferring or moving energy unrelated to...

... the Conservation of Energy Law in physics.




Also covered in this video is the illusion of energy transfer or conversion or movement based on a transverse wave pattern that we recognize making movement or transfer or conversion irrelevant to what has actually happened.

From where does Free Energy come? Wrong question! How can we conserve the energy that we spend?

By segregating energy into a hierarchy of some energy being central to other energy happily performing all the grunge work, and by reserving the privilege of allowing only the central aristocratic energy to have most of the liability for feeding the grunge workers. This occurs as a two step process of accumulating energy among the aristocrats (a whirlpool of energy situated in the center of the LMD module of the circuit which I'm studying) and distributing among the aristocrats and the grunge workers. By distributing energy is this manner, energy is conserved. It takes less energy to serve one's self up as a role model than it takes to dissipate the performance of grunge work.




We all enjoy hearing physicists describe the discrete energy states of an electron, but do we ever hear about the influence the neutron has in determining the energy states of an electron? And is the expense of the neutron's job equivalent to the expense of the electron's job? Yet, if the neutron uses only one unit of influence to commandeer the electron into performing ten units of service, that's a gain of ten to one - a coefficient of performance of 1,000%!

Color Index = Kinetic Frequency = A Filament Bulb is a new type of Energy Storage and Reactance.

Just like a capacitor will discharge with a surge of reversed electric polarity, and just like a coiled inductor will discharge with a surge of reversed magnetic polarity, a filament bulb releases what? Heat? Or, thermionic induction to the circuit? There's something about a lamp, a filament bulb - not a gas discharge tube, that retains memory of its prior state and also has the ability to respond to change of state with the memory of its former state, namely: it hasn't stopped illuminating. The rest of the circuit's oscillations may be momentarily slowing down, but just when I think the circuit will die it surprises me and renews itself with another surge of abundance. From where did that renewal arise? From the lamp taking a very long time spending its kinetic frequency by reducing its color index (rated in Kelvins of all things!). Instead of losing - dissipating - that kinetic frequency, instead, it retained it for a long enough duration so that it might have it to share with the rest of the circuit when the circuit would be most receptive to assistance: when the circuit is about to die from having exhausted all of its other electric and magnetic resources.

How does my free energy device induce a force without expending it? By dividing up a circuit ....

... into multiple forces in which at least one force need not interact with anything other than another force - but not with the inertia of matter. Thus, these multiple forces can specialize themselves : one force can specialize on harboring the speed of amperage while another force can specialize on harboring the pressure of voltage. Thus, the "speedster's" job (positioned near the power source) will be to resist any attempt made by the power source to spend any amperage when it contributes voltage to the circuit by engulfing (smothering) the power source with a tremendous surge of its own accumulated amperage. The "torquester's" job will be to resist any attempt made by the load to lose any voltage to the circuit by engulfing (smothering) the load with a tremendous surge of its own accumulated voltage. These two separate tasks are created (subdivided) by the central whirlpool of electricity circulating within the confines of the Electric Keeper. This Electric Keeper is the analog computer in longitudinal magneto-dielectric mode of Eric Dollard composed of two toroidal transformers facing each other with two capacitors situated between them. By orienting the transformer's primary and secondary windings in such a way as to induce a step up of voltage away from the power source towards the load, the load is prevented from expending any voltage while the power source is prevented from expending any amperage. Thus, there's no appearance of any wattage at the source despite the pervasive presence of amperage throughout the circuit soliciting the appearance of wattage at the load. It's much easier to fight voltage than it is to fight amperage - in this special case, because the load is not contributing any voltage of its own. The load must merely conserve its voltage by transferring it away from the circuit - not towards it.




Editor's note - this last statement reads confused. And my video keeps repeating the notion that I need to pulse a dc source. I have learned a lot since two days ago when I taped this. Pulses are not needed. The initial kick off turning off the power is sufficient to initiate oscillations. And oscillations are sufficient to maintain themselves under the right circumstances. And the kinetic frequency of the filament within a glowing light bulb is sufficient to drive an overunity device to infinity and self-destruction from meltdown or explosion.

From where does Free Energy come?

Whirlpools of Oscillating Power Create their own Rules.

A load is a resistor; it creates voltage as a consequence of its resistance. A power source is a negative resistor; it creates amperage as a consequence of its negative resistance.

A load is a resistor only so long as it resists. It ceases to be a load the instant it stops resisting.

A source of power is a negative resistor so long as it negatively resists. It ceases to be a source of power the instant it stops negatively resisting.

A battery is not a source of power, because it is not a negative resistor. It is a load with an internal resistance based on its change of state. It cannot supply amperage; the wire connecting its two terminals supplies that.

A battery is like a capacitor in that it is capable of storing energy - not supplying it. The difference between the two is that the dielectric material between the two capacitor plates is equivalent to the electrolyte within the battery; both store energy - they do not supply it. Ultimately, energy has to come from somewhere else.

From where does it come? It comes from negative resistance.

What is a negative resistor? A negative resistor is a situation in which it takes less energy to maintain its status as a negative resistor than it takes to induce a change of state within another resistor.

Resistors possess inertia; they don't like to have their status as a resistor altered without a definitive cost. This cost - we have come to know - is the cost of supplying power to its resistance acting as a load. And if we make the mistake of supplying too much power to a load, the load retaliates with heat or - worse – sudden breakdown.

But in the case of an LMD module acting as an intermediate source of power for a load, it merely intermediates its supply of power to a load through other whirlpools of reactive power who have to interact with loads directly. Yet, if merely one whirlpool stands aloof from having to deal with the real world of positive resistors, and merely induce kinetic motion to other whirlpools who directly deal with positively resistive loads, then its own kinetic inertia is preserved while periodically boosting the waning inertia of other whirlpools.

Amperage knows no resistance. That's the job of voltage. Voltage knows no motion. That's the job of amperage. Whirlpools of reactive power can specialize in whether they want to focus on setting forces to move in the real world of matter, heat and light, or else they can remain aloof and exclusively deal with other whirlpools of reactive power at very little – if any – cost to themselves, because it takes very little – if any – energy to transfer its own reactive power to another whirlpool wanting more reactive power. The funny thing about isolated whirlpools is that they get a kick out of demands made upon themselves to serve up more energy to other whirlpools whose task is to lose that power by way of dissipation. This kick amplifies the aloof whirlpool, rather than slowing it down, since it knows no resistance – hence, it knows no voltage, either. Without a voltage drop, amperage can wildly escalate itself; heal itself of having spent itself in service towards other whirlpools who can't possibly heal themselves who have been wound down in direct service towards the outside world of non-reactive power.

Continuous and Manually Pulsed DC in Eric Dollard's LMD

When I first began to experiment with Eric Dollard's analog computer in Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric mode using only one module powered by a DC source, I tried manually pulsing the DC source ON and OFF to induce overunity...

But I also tried leaving the switch ON without pulsing it for a milder gain in overunity...

Download this binary text file and save it onto your computer, iPhone, whatever...

https://is.gd/manual_pulse_LMD

And load it into this JavaScripted Simulator...

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Capping Overunity of Giga Amperage Appearing at the Output of the 555 Timer

Despite the claim that a shorter duty cycle results in greater overunity, I discovered this is not true for higher voltages feeding the 555 timer chip. A 50/50 duty cycle gives greater overunity over a wider range of voltages by comparison to a shorter duty cycle.

Yet, I still had a problem with giga amps appearing at the output of the 555 timer and climbing to apparent infinity without limit! So, I put a 4 nano Ohm resistor between the 555 timer's output and the switch separating it from the LMD circuit. {LMD - Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric of Eric Dollard's analog computer. See, his Borderland video.} This froze the over-amperage at a steady state and at a maximal value for the two central lamps of the LMD module to light up - and remain lit - at a minimum temperature for white brilliance. By raising the resistance of this little resistor ever so slightly can effectively snub the magical appearance of giga, or mega, amperage at the 555 timer's output.

I removed one lamp (that I had been using for dumping excess buildup of energy from within the LMD whenever the switch is opened after running the circuit for any length of time), because it wasn't doing much good (where it was positioned) while the switch is closed (or, at least this seemed to me). So, I added two more lamps in a different position in parallel flanking the overall design (where the spark gaps - neon bulbs - used to be in prior designs; see earlier posts).

BTW, the ten volt lamps and power source is arbitrary. It can be anything; yet, the outcome will remain the same! Just be sure and match the lamp's Nominal Voltage with the voltage of the power source to prevent irregularities from arising (which I have been steadfastly trying my best to prevent!).

Including the two central capacitors within the LMD loop (what would have been the Electric Keeper of B&L) makes the grounding rods and neon bulb (GDT: gas discharge tube) of Barbosa and Leal obsolete. But it introduces a new problem of regulating this device's abundant overunity.

Download this binary text file and save it onto your computer, or other device (Android, iPhone, et cetera)...

https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD3

Then load it into this JavaScript Simulator for designing and bench testing electronic circuits...

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Off Duty Cycle equals OverUnity for Pulsed DC

Lewis Carrol's "Through the Looking Glass" comes to mind whenever I think about how to describe my study of electrical overunity - nothing is as it seems. I turn a circuit off thinking how I'll stop it from continuing to climb upwards toward infinity of putting out far more watts than it takes into itself, and all I've managed to do is accelerate its ascension. If I add more resistance to the load - thinking that this will slow down overunity, all I've managed to do is speed it up yet again. Weird.

https://is.gd/normal_behavior
https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD
https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD2

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

The next step in developing a free energy device is a pulsed D.C. version.

But before that happens, I've managed to convert one output to DC using a full bridge rectifier...
https://is.gd/LMD_v3

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Energy IN vs Energy OUT does not tell the whole story whenever Electrical Recycling is involved.

Electricity is not the same as force, nor the same as substance. Once spent, force - like mass - is gone. But electricity is not a force; nor is it mass - yet, it is a property of mass. Since the mass of wire is not consumed upon the use of the electrical phenomena within the wire, that electricity can be reused again and again as an oscillating phenomenon. The only caveat is the loss due to inefficiency of the wire (in this example).

No negative resistance need be invoked. No energy from the vacuum. Recycling limited resources is a sign of maturity, not a sign of depravity.

Results of Charting 19 Possible Switching Combinations

Here is the circuit I used for these experiments...

https://is.gd/3lamp_LMD5

And here is its slight modification based on these experiments...

https://is.gd/3lamp_LMD6

But before I finished my chart...

https://is.gd/chart_LMD5

...I played around with this little circuit...

https://is.gd/linear_LMD

Here is my simple LMD with shunt circuit...

Circuit...
https://is.gd/LMD_v1

I added a snubber circuit across each switch to protect against potential surges...
https://is.gd/LMD_v2

Before attempting to swap out the AC Power Source with a pulsed DC, I managed to convert one of the two Inner Lamps (acting as Load) to output DC using a full bridge rectifier...
https://is.gd/LMD_v3

Download any of these simulator files and save them to your computer, then load them into this simulator...

https://is.gd/blankcanvas

How do we explain the manifestation of free energy? By separating voltage from an AC sine wave and take its square root only when the voltage is most negative.

How do we explain the manifestation of free energy? By separating voltage from an AC sine wave and take its square root only when the voltage is most negative. Mother Nature will counter-balance that action by squaring a preexisting imaginary component of a complex value of aetheric amperage. The net result, for all intents and purposes, will appear as if the amperage materialized from out of nowhere! Voila! Free Energy!

And where do we find examples of this? In the characteristics of a neon bulb. Its ON state of resistance is the square root of its OFF state of resistance.

For example,
To simulate a neon bulb in the simulator of Paul Falstad and Iain Sharp, I enter the following values:

Strike Voltage = 65 volts
Holding Current = 3m Amps
ON Resistance = 3k Ohms
OFF Resistance = 10M Ohms

10M = 10,000,000
3k = 3,000

3,162 x 3,162 = 9,998,244

3k is the approximate square root of 10M. Hence, I suspect this is how the neon bulb dematerializes negative voltage: by taking its square root. Mother Nature, then, makes up the difference by manifesting an equivalent value of amperage from the complex world of counter-space. {See the works of Eric Dollard.}

Negative Resistance of a Gas Discharge Tube is Explained by Nascent Arc Welders - William Lyne

William Lyne has an explanation for the operation of a hydrogen arc welder that is directly relevant to why a little bitty neon bulb should give more amperage per additional resistance applied to a fixed voltage via leveraging from somewhere else other than the gas inside the neon bulb and other than the electric arc jumping across the two electrodes: energy from the environment.

If B&L can induce this characteristic in its entire circuit via oscillating voltage accumulation (conforming the entire circuit to the neon bulb's behavior under its pressure of coercion), including the volume of Earth between the two sets of grounding rods, then the additional energy is not coming from the Earth - according to Mr. Lyne, but because of it.

So, I guess there's no way around Eric Dollard's counter-space, complex numbers, version of explaining this overunity phenomenon involving negative resistors? In other words, there's no conventional explanation possible.

Atomic Hydrogen (Arc Welding)

Energy in Air

Negative Resistance = The more you get closer, the more you slip-slidin'...

Neon Bulb Placement is Predicated on its Role as a Negative Resistor.

This applies to any overunity circuit whose behavior depends on the contribution which a gas discharge tube can impart to some or another part of the circuit to which this component is included.

I'm thinking of the Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal. We want the Earth to become one gigantic negative resistor so that it will yield more amperage per increased resistance arising from additional demands made by a load (of appliances ;-). This, the neon bulb, or other appropriate sparking gap, can induce somehow within other components of the circuit to which it is attached including the load as well. But in the case of B&L, we especially want the volume of Earth in between the two sets of grounding rods to behave as a negative resistor so that whenever the load induces an increased resistance upon the Electric Keeper, in turn a demand for more amperage is imposed upon the Earth provided that the Earth can respond with a greater supply of amperage to the grounding rods. This will not happen if there is not enough grounding rods among the greater set of rods directly connected to the Captor Loop. But also if there is not enough geomagnetism in the area, or both. For we want the Earth to behave like the gas inside of the neon bulb. And we want the two sets of grounding rods to behave like the two electrodes inside of  the neon bulb. The neon bulb can't provide abundant free energy on its own. Neither can the Earth. But the two together make for a splendid team work. And if the Lenz effect is neutralized between the two toroidal transformers flanking both sides of the Electric Keeper and loosely coupled to it, then only amperage will flow inside of the Electric Keeper. And since only amperage is being collected by the greater of the two sets of grounding rods, this whole system of enhancing a tiny input of power is very well designed by two excellent inventors, Nilson Barbosa and Cleriston Leal as successfully replicated by Clarence of Carolina, USA.

Oscillating Power is a Hysteresis of Duty Cycle imparting an Illusion of Free Energy

I don't think that my little simulation of Eric Dollard's LMD (analog computer in Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric mode) actually produces power inside the LMD module when the AC power source is shut OFF. Actually, I think that each cycle of oscillation begins before the last one ends building upon the prior and gaining a little more amplitude with each successive cycle giving the appearance of energy from the vacuum - energy created from nowhere. But it sure does look - for all intents and purposes - as if that is what has occurred whenever certain switches are engaged and others are not. I don't remember which ones. You'll have to play around with it...

Version One with Switches

Blank Canvass

I hope to do a chart of all eight possible combinations of switchings and their outcomes. In the meantime, I'd like to share with you what I went through the very first time I simulated free energy in disastrously humongous proportions...

Extreme OverUnity!

Blank Canvass

WIPEOUT!

Extreme OverUnity with Two Loads!

Blank Canvass

In both of these two varieties of Extreme Overunity, a strange anomaly occurs. You think you're being dandy by shutting OFF the AC power to prevent any further mischief, but what happens? The amps, volts, and watts skyrocket even faster than when the AC power had been ON! No fooling!

And where does this escalation occur? EVERYWHERE in the circuit!!!! Now, that's indiscreet OVERUNITY!

Here is a very simple version of this basic concept with only four switches and a modest, rock solid output hanging around the kilo-volt range. Two additional loads are added to the inside of the LMD module...

Four Switches

And here is a very long video describing my inspired thinking on why some of us are convinced that free energy arises from out of nowhere – whenever it occurs as the result of oscillating power, but actually comes from hysteresis originating in the NEGATIVE RESISTANCE of a GAS DISCHARGE TUBE, or SPARK GAP, and then spreads throughout the circuit infecting everything including the load due to HYSTERESIS becoming applied to all of the components of the circuit (including the load - which is attached and must be included). This pervasive hysteresis is the byproduct of severe stress shocking the whole circuit to sustain the belief among all of the circuit's various components that they, too, are NEGATIVE RESISTORS just like the spark gap.

Negative Resistance is the Reality of Free Energy and Overunity. Look it up at Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_Resistance

A gas discharge tube is a negative resistor. Find them in every neon bulb and every fluorescent tube (without its ballast).

Don't allow Wikipedia to tie us up in knots of confusion involving circular reasoning to obfuscate the truth of negative resistance. Ignore Wikipedia's confusing analogy that amperage drops as a consequence of voltage, and confusingly vice versa. Focus, instead, on the truth of negative resistance neatly tucked away in a simple math relation: the speed of amperage increases as the friction of resistance increases. And since the speed of amperage times the pressure of voltage equals the power of watts, then an increase in friction results in an increase of power. Overunity and free energy is this simple!

My simulation of negative resistance...
https://is.gd/eureka_v1