When is a machine not perpetual motion? When it can be convincingly explained! Eureka!

Are perpetual motion

machines possible?

 

So, at 3:26, if something is called a perpetual motion machine, then this implies that it can't be explained how it works, because it doesn't use any Laws of Physics, and thus does not work outside of fraud or trickery. Instead, it uses hyperbole by its creator or promoter to make up for solid analysis? So, all I have to do, or anyone else for that matter, is be able to explain why something "appears" to be a perpetual motion machine, but actually isn't, merely because it doesn't defy any Law of Physics (such as the Drinking Bird Toy example), because it can readily be explained in terms we already know from having studied Physics, Thermodynamics, Electrical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, etc? So, this use of the term: "perpetual motion machine", by Physics Girl, helps me to understand why so often this term is used in my face by (sometimes) not very friendly people whose patience has worn so thin, that any discussion of "apparent" perpetual motion machines never gets started, or maintained for very long, simply because no one has thoroughly, nor accurately, analyzed any candidate machine for either debunking it or explaining it - and so, consequentially, it does not exist as a true machine, but merely exists as an artistry of magic and imagination? Whew! I feel much better, now, because I understand that just because some machine is called "perpetual motion" does not make it so. In fact, it is our collective misuse of language that perpetrates this dilemma. So long as a machine can't be explained, so long is it a candidate for perpetual motion, but still not yet a fully-fledged, bonefide perpetual motion machine. In other words, a non-perpetual motion machine is a definitive machine while a perpetual motion machine is not. All we've managed to do is define what a machine is and exclude everything else which lies outside of our collective ability to define machines. A perpetual motion machine's only flaw is that it has yet to graduate to the status of a true machine and specific instances of "apparent" perpetual motion have yet to be explained. Well, it's back to the drawing boards and the study of basic and advanced scientific theory... 

Since when is secrecy an advantage in an era of an enlightened democracy?

Making Barbosa and Leal mobile within the context of an EV.

Attempt at Applying B&L to my EV, v.25-Jan-2017

The purpose of the interleaved capacitors is to get them to phase lock their charge and discharge cycles. This is very powerful. I learned it developing my application of Eric Dollard's analog computer in Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric mode applied to Leon Ernest Eeman's biocircuit with fantastic results. Of course, the successful replication of B&L by Clarence is used to reference any modifications...

How do I gain expertise as a critique of Barbosa and Leal?

Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy,
by Nikola Tesla – patent # 685,957 – 5 Nov. 1901.

Based on my prior work of attempting to deduce how does Tesla's Special Generator operate, I chose to create an experiment in which my consciousness during sleep at night would enter into a device on its way to Earth ground from an Earthing bedsheet. I even sought and acquired a provisional patent, but – alas – no manufacturer I contacted wanted to sell it. So, I stopped development.

Then, along came a YouTuber by the name of Faithahora asking for some advice and consequentially inspiring me to revive my experiments.

The basic premise to my invention was the simple idea of wrapping the grounding wire around a magnetizable toroid. An additional feature was to wrap two toroids with the grounding wire, each in opposite directions (clockwise versus counter-clockwise), and connect them in a loop ...

… and, thus, create a loop similar to the primary windings surrounding the Electric Keeper in Barbosa and Leal's Earth Captor (although not entirely the same since my windings were inversely wound), ...

... plus attach a permanent magnet of very high strength to both of them (preferably, a neodymium), and sandwich them together, bury them in quartz sand in a plastic bucket lined with aluminum foil.

But now, with the help of knowing about Clarence's replication of Barbosa and Leal, I've managed to restart my sleep circuit experiments without the assistance of any manmade energy source: just the Earth and my body, plus electrical components. Here's my present setup...

If you ignore the top-most diode, and ignore the resistor with neon bulb along with its aluminum plate, then the only thing I know for sure is that the bottom diode must point towards the toroid. For if it does not, then it will feel like the life force is being sucked out of the body! But by facing it upwards (towards the magnetic influence of the toroid), it acts as a shield of immunity against unsavory influences of ill will entering into one's consciousness during sleep. Also, the grounding wire must be wrapped around a ferromagnetizable toroid. This is all I know. The remainder is experimental conjecture since I have not tried out alternatives to control for variations or placebos.

What I do know, but refuse to implement, is to surround the wire wrapped toroid with a layer of aluminum foil rather than employ the use of the continuous loop of heavy gauge wire – looped once through the center of the toroid, and the neon bulb with its little resistor; these are extras thrown in for no apparent reason other than: “why not?”. But aluminum foil covering the toroid sets up an intense kundalini awakening making it difficult to get the full quota of sleep at night or at any other time. That's why I learned to put a dielectric, such as quartz sand, between the aluminum foil enclosure and the grounding wire wrapped toroid/s to “dampen” the kundalini awakening energizing effect.

Here's how my present setup looks...

You Guys and Gals make me proud,

Because you do what I cannot...

Some of us can do it all while some us can only do so much. So, if I analyze Clarence's successful replication of the Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal to empower each and every one of us to think for ourselves and contribute in our own way, then I will have done my job to my satisfaction.

William Lyne doesn't have all the answers anymore than I do. He's speculating on Tesla's Special Generator, because there's not enough information to complete the story of wondering how it works. But, today, I'm adding one more similarity between his story and what we know about the Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal: the analogy between the Electric Keeper and the very long ELF winding which William has speculated exists within Tesla's Special Generator:

Besides the similarity of the larger of the two masses of steel grounding rods in B&L versus “200 pounds of iron connected to the device, a full horsepower was added to it” in Tesla's Special Generator (quoting Mr. Lyne)....

“The windings on the oscillator were about 50 miles in length, and its inductive- capacitive system allowed it to operate on a frequency which was consistent with the earth’s, at a wavelength of about 925 miles, with a frequency close to 13.5 c.p.s., sometimes mentioned in relation to Naval ELF communications. Was this part of Tesla’s long wave system for “transmission of electric energy without wires”, which he said he had completed just prior to his death, as shown in the FBI documents? Is the Navy’s ELF (“Extremely Low Frequencies”) system not only for communications, just as Tesla said, but also for broadcasting energy to submarines—just as Tesla also said?”

I'm here to tell you that a long ELF winding is not necessary given what Clarence has managed to do: eliminate the Lenz effect within the Electric Keeper. This makes the Electric Keeper infinitely long, because it can't see any mile markers along the entire length of its function as a waveguide for its amperage. And because it self-loops, it's effectively infinitely long or a super-conductor of minimalist resistance for all intents and purposes. This makes it possible for an oscillating current – without voltage – to build up within this Electric Keeper driven by the additional voltage lying outside the Keeper generated between the two sets of grounding rods. Normally, this spontaneous formation of oscillations are analogously possible only within the context of very long transmission lines, especially if they're DC transmission lines.

But because this oscillation is kept within the parameters of the AC Sinewave Inverter's output via the voltage equalizing shunt between the line of plug #1 and the Electric Keeper, its oscillations are kept in phase with the output of the AC Sinewave Inverter and, thus, the Electric Keeper's oscillations are not allowed to become parasitic (the implication of parasitic oscillations of diminishing amplitude is that beat frequencies transfer energy from the primary oscillation to the secondary beats, killing the primary and killing the beats by consequential implication).

One more clue that B&L embodies the essential parameters of Tesla's Special Generator.

Just think of the Electric Keeper as a substitute for a Homopolar Disk. Then, it is easy to see that Barbosa and Leal's device supersedes William Lyne's supposition that an electro-mechanical watt-hour meter is the only analogy we have to imagine Tesla's Special Generator.

Overunity Archetype

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vinyasi/sandbox

The Overunity (archetype) is the apparent exploitation of one or more natural resources with little or no concern for whether these resources are limited or unlimited. Thus, much of an overunity archetype's success is owed to under-accountability despite its dependency on open systems' resourcing. But this is usually not a concern if the consumption of resource is sizably reused or recycled, either by the device or by nature, in an adequate amount of time prior to its next use by the device or by anyone else.

An ideal overunity archetype is one which operates in harmony with its environment — from which is derived its main source of archetypal energy — so that its resource does not become destroyed, nor lessened, by the operation of this archetype.

Contents

• 1Archetypal Overunity vs Efficiency
• 2Examples for Comparison
• 3Example for Contrast
• 4What An Overunity Archetype Is
• 5What An Overunity Archetype Is Not
• 6Technical Definition
  • 6.1Implementation Intention & the Butterfly Effect
  • 6.2Cascading Failure
  • 6.3Principle of Least Effort
  • 6.4Mechanical Advantage
  • 6.5Law of the Lever
  • 6.6Emotional Advantage
• 7Analysis of a Prank
  • 7.1Implementation Intention
  • 7.2Butterfly Effect
  • 7.3Mechanical Advantage
  • 7.4Cascading Failure
  • 7.5Principle of Least Effort
  • 7.6Law of the Lever
• 8Overunity Archetypes
  • 8.1Heat Pump
  • 8.2Atomic Hydrogen Furnace
• 9The Archetypes of Overunity and Perpetual Motion
• 10Conclusion
• 11See Also
• 12References
• 13External Links